Murad Rashid Muhammad v. Toys "R" Us Murad Rashid Muhammad v. Toys "R" Us

Murad Rashid Muhammad v. Toys "R" Us

1996.FL.42044 ; 668 SO. 2D 254; 21 FLA. LAW W. D 420

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Appellant Murad Rashid Muhammad (Muhammad), as natural guardian of Muharram Muhammad, appeals from a jury verdict and judgment rendered in favor of appellee, Toys "R" Us, Inc. (Toys "R" Us), in an action for negligence and products liability. Muhammad claims, and we agree, that he is entitled to a new trial on the grounds that improper statements and inflammatory remarks uttered by counsel for Toys "R" Us during closing argument and voir dire exceeded the bounds of propriety, prejudicially influencing the jury and negating a fair trial. We reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
15 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
72.3
KB

More Books by First District Court of Appeal of Florida

James M. Dawson and Veldina Dawson v. Ncnb National Bank Florida James M. Dawson and Veldina Dawson v. Ncnb National Bank Florida
1991
Arand Construction Co. v. Duford Dyer Arand Construction Co. v. Duford Dyer
1991
Robert A. Riedel v. Ncnb National Bank Florida Robert A. Riedel v. Ncnb National Bank Florida
1991
Danny Foote and Betty J. Foote v. Green Tree Acceptance Danny Foote and Betty J. Foote v. Green Tree Acceptance
1991
O'Kon and Company v. Robert A. Riedel O'Kon and Company v. Robert A. Riedel
1991
Sandra M. Marlowe v. Dogs Only Grooming and Travelers Insurance Company Sandra M. Marlowe v. Dogs Only Grooming and Travelers Insurance Company
1991