U.S. Xpress U.S. Xpress

U.S. Xpress

136 P.3D 999, 139 N.M. 589, 2006-NMSC-017, 2006.NM.0000037

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

1 This case requires us to decide whether the Tax Administration Act permits the courts to recognize the doctrine of "vicarious" or "virtual" exhaustion of remedies to allow a class action to proceed when only a few members of the proposed class have exhausted their administrative remedies. Because the Tax Administration Act provides the exclusive remedies for tax refunds and requires the taxpayer to individually seek the refund, we decline to adopt vicarious or virtual exhaustion for proceedings under the Tax Administration Act, and reverse the opinion of the Court of Appeals. We affirm the district courts finding that the numerosity requirement of the class action rule is not met in this case because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over proposed class members who have not exhausted their administrative remedies.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
13 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.2
KB

More Books by In the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico

In re Yalkut In re Yalkut
2008
State v. Santiago State v. Santiago
2010
Cortez v. Cortez Cortez v. Cortez
2009
State v. Montoya State v. Montoya
2008
Doe v. Santa Clara Pueblo Doe v. Santa Clara Pueblo
2007
In re Treinen In re Treinen
2006