



Byron L. Rakes v. Beth Wright
1986.IN.31092 498 N.E.2D 101
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
The primary issue we consider in this appeal is whether certain recorded statements taken from representatives of the appellants, DeMoss Rexall Drugs and pharmacist Robert Malcolm (collectively referred to as DeMoss) by DeMosss insurance carrier are discoverable pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 26(b).