Remington Freight Lines v. Julie Larkey Remington Freight Lines v. Julie Larkey

Remington Freight Lines v. Julie Larkey

1994.IN.32111 ; 644 N.E.2D 931

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

John McClanahan (McClanahan) originally filed suit against Remington Freight Lines, Inc. (Remington), and Richard Barbour, Remingtons safety director.[Footnote 1] McClanahan, who was employed as a truckdriver, claimed that Remington wrongfully discharged him in retaliation for his refusal to violate Illinois law by driving his truck through the state with a load greater than the statutory maximum 73,280 pound weight limit. Upon appeal of both parties motions for summary judgment, the Indiana Supreme Court held that McClanahan did possess a cause of action for retaliatory discharge, though he was an employee-at-will and was hired for no specific time period. McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc. (1988) Ind., 517 N.E.2d 390 (hereinafter, McClanahan II).[Footnote 2]

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1994
29 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
25
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
73
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982