Yates V. Avco Corp. Yates V. Avco Corp.

Yates V. Avco Corp‪.‬

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Avco Corporation appeals the judgment holding them liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, for the sexual harassment of two female employees by their supervisor, Edwin Sanders, in the course of his duties. Sanders did not appeal the judgment entered against him personally. We feel on this record there is sufficient evidence to affirm on the issue of Avco's liability. However, Charlotte Yates (Street) did not adequately prove she was constructively discharged from her employment at Avco Corporation. We also find that the district court erred in finding that Avco retaliated against Cheryl Mathis. For the reasons stated below the judgment of the district court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a recalculation of damages consistent with this opinion.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1987
21 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
22
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
61.5
KB

Más libros de United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit

United States v. Wesley United States v. Wesley
2005
Ross v. Wall Street Systems Ross v. Wall Street Systems
2005
[U] Higgins v. International Union [U] Higgins v. International Union
2005
Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Hammond Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Hammond
2004
In re Huffman In re Huffman
2004
Swix v. Daisy Manufacturing Co. Swix v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.
2004