City of Wichita v. Lucero City of Wichita v. Lucero

City of Wichita v. Lucero

255 Kan. 437, 874 P.2d 1144, KS.0042137(1994)

    • €0.99
    • €0.99

Publisher Description

The opinion of the court was delivered by This is an appeal by the City of Wichita (City) from the
district court's ruling that the mandatory minimum fine provision
for repeat offenders, as set forth in § 5.66.055(b) of the Code
of the City of Wichita, is unconstitutional. This appeal is taken
upon a question reserved by the City pursuant to K.S.A. 1993
Supp. 22-3602(b)(3). The facts are not in dispute. James Lucero was arrested on
December 2, 1992, for violating § 5.66.055(a)(1) of the Code of
the City of Wichita. The ordinance makes it unlawful for any
person to intentionally interfere with or obstruct the conduct of
a lawful business. The defendant was arrested while participating
in a pro-life demonstration at a women's clinic located in
Wichita.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
27 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
PROVIDER INFO
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
67
KB
Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs
1996
In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks
1996
Gillespie v. Seymour Gillespie v. Seymour
1991
Bair v. Peck Bair v. Peck
1991
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986