Conflict Between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners (Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization) Conflict Between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners (Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization)

Conflict Between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners (Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization‪)‬

Clinical Chemistry 2006, Jan, 52, 1

    • €2.99
    • €2.99

Publisher Description

The methodologic quality of current practice guidelines must be improved (1-20). For many reasons, the methodologic quality of diagnostic guidelines is poorer than that of therapeutic guidelines, particularly in the field of laboratory medicine (10, 21, 22). It is not clear, however, whether these shortcomings in the methodology of guideline development necessarily lead to invalid recommendations, i.e., those that are not supported with consistent research evidence or sufficient consensus among the guideline development team when evidence is conflicting or lacking. We assessed to what extent methodologic quality is linked to recommendation validity in practice guidelines for the use of laboratory tests in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), [7] specifically laboratory tests measuring quantities in biological specimens, thus excluding tissue (or anatomic) pathology tests. Surgery performed at the early stages of NSCLC (I, II, or IIIA to a lesser extent) offers patients a reasonable chance of long-term survival, but this option is available to only a small minority of patients. In more advanced NSCLC (IIIB or higher), chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy with radiotherapy are options, but these therapies mostly aim to prolong patient survival, and the over-whelming majority of patients relapse. In many treatment facilities, no standard therapeutic schemes exist; therefore, controlled trials that include as many patients as possible are needed to assess the potential contribution of new drugs and new therapeutic schemes (23-26). Demonstrating the superiority of a given protocol over another is difficult to accomplish if the prognostic features of different patient subgroups cannot be compared. Consequently, independent prognostic factors must be identified before valid therapeutic trials can be designed, conducted, and interpreted (27). The medical and scientific communities have developed methods for conducting and reporting such therapeutic trials (28).

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2006
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
26
Pages
PUBLISHER
American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
PROVIDER INFO
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
234.9
KB
D-Dimer Testing for Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Metaanalysis (Clinical Report) D-Dimer Testing for Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Metaanalysis (Clinical Report)
2004
Congenital Analbuminemia Attributable to Compound Heterozygosity for Novel Mutations in the Albumin Gene (Technical Briefs) Congenital Analbuminemia Attributable to Compound Heterozygosity for Novel Mutations in the Albumin Gene (Technical Briefs)
2005
Highly Sensitive Immunoprecipitation Method for Extracting and Concentrating Low-Abundance Proteins from Human Serum (Technical Briefs) Highly Sensitive Immunoprecipitation Method for Extracting and Concentrating Low-Abundance Proteins from Human Serum (Technical Briefs)
2005
Measurement of Pro-C-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Plasma (Technical Briefs) Measurement of Pro-C-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Plasma (Technical Briefs)
2005
Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Editorials) Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Editorials)
2005
Inadequate Attempts to Measure the Microheterogeneity of Transthyretin by Low-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (Letters) (Letter to the Editor) Inadequate Attempts to Measure the Microheterogeneity of Transthyretin by Low-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (Letters) (Letter to the Editor)
2005