Haight v. Handweiler Haight v. Handweiler

Haight v. Handweiler

CA.41130; 244 Cal. Rptr. 488; 199 Cal. App. 3d 85 (1988)

    • €0.99
    • €0.99

Publisher Description

[199 CalApp3d Page 87] Charles Haight filed an action for malicious prosecution against Dr. John Godes and Martin Handweiler, Godes's attorney, based on a previous action from which Godes had voluntarily dismissed Haight. The issue of whether the dismissal constituted a favorable termination was bifurcated and tried first. After taking testimony and receiving documentary evidence, the court found the element of favorable termination lacking and granted judgment for the defendants. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1988
29 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59
KB

More Books by Fourth Appellate District, Division Three Court of Appeal of California

Jensen V. Hewlett-Packard Co. Jensen V. Hewlett-Packard Co.
1993
Zambrano v. Dorough Zambrano v. Dorough
1986
Little v. Harbor Pacific Mortgage Investors No. 79B Little v. Harbor Pacific Mortgage Investors No. 79B
1985
Hollingsworth v. Superior Court of Orange County Hollingsworth v. Superior Court of Orange County
1987
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County
1987
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek
1987