Icke v. State

Appellant, Steven Richard Icke, was charged with driving while intoxicated, after being stopped for speeding. He filed a motion to suppress, contesting the legality of the stop. A hearing was held by the trial court, and the motion was denied. Appellant then pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement. In this appeal, he raises two points of error: (1) that the trial court erred in denying appellants motion to suppress; and (2) that the trial judge improperly took judicial notice of scientific evidence relied upon by the State, to wit: the reliability of the radar instrument used to gauge a vehicles speed. We affirm.