Instrumentation Services v. General

1. Third-party plaintiffs were not entitled to recovery on the theory of conspiracy in unlawful competition where they presented insufficient evidence of the existence of a conspiracy and where the record demonstrated that, in any event, they suffered no damages from the claimed conspiracy. 2. In the present case, the proper measure of damages a subcontractor was entitled to receive from a contractor who materially breached a subcontract, where the subcontractor had only partially completed its performance, was the full contract price minus the savings the subcontractor realized because it was not required to fully perform the contract.