Logic, Probability, and Presumptions in Legal Reasoning Logic, Probability, and Presumptions in Legal Reasoning
    • €219.99

Publisher Description

At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the "sophistical" arguments offered by the Sophists -- who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and the justifications they offer for their decisions are a vital means by which citizens can assess the legitimacy of how that power is exercised. However, to evaluate judicial justifications requires close attention to the method of reasoning behind decisions. This new collection illuminates and explains the political and moral importance in justifying the exercise of judicial power.

GENRE
Non-Fiction
RELEASED
2013
17 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
416
Pages
PUBLISHER
Taylor & Francis
SIZE
5.3
MB
Arguing on the Toulmin Model Arguing on the Toulmin Model
2007
Moral Strata Moral Strata
2014
Belief, Action, and Rationality over Time Belief, Action, and Rationality over Time
2018
Being Rational and Being Right Being Rational and Being Right
2020
Pesky Essays on the Logic of Philosophy Pesky Essays on the Logic of Philosophy
2014
Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic
2012
Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning
2013
Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
2013
Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning
2013
Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
2013