Sham Peer Review: Perversions of a Powerful Process (Peer Review)
Physician Executive, 2008, Sept-Oct, 34, 5
-
- €2.99
-
- €2.99
Publisher Description
Sham peer review distorts the medical staff's quality assurance system via "peer review." Formal, informal and punitive sanctions are accomplished, in bad faith, but disguised to appear as if the actions were legitimate. It is peer review ostensibly about one thing but really about something else. Participating in sham peer review is a violation of most codes of professional conduct. Participants disrespect professional colleagues, vested self-regulation, and promote discriminatory standards of professionalism.
Tactics Characteristic of Sham Peer Review (Editorial)
2009
Do As I Say, Not As I Do: Why Bioethecists should Seek Informed Consent for Some Case Studies.
2004
Confidentiality & Record Keeping in Counselling & Psychotherapy
2014
Crime in the Professions
2017
Refusing to Accept the Unacceptable
2020
Essential Law for Counsellors and Psychotherapists
2010
The Role of Project Managers Who Assist Physician Leaders at Mayo Clinic (Project Management)
2011
Toyota-Style Management Drives Virginia Mason (Virginia Mason Medical Center )
2006
The Unlikely Activist; In 2004, U.S. Forces in Iraq Were Locked in Some of the Bloodiest Urban Warfare Since Vietnam, Culminating in the Fierce Street Battles to Retake Fallujah. That November, 137 American Soldiers Were Killed and More Than 1,400 Were Injured (Profile)
2008
Six Principles of Persuasion You Can Use to Influence Others (Behavior)
2008
Knowing No Boundaries: Five Crucial Conversations for Influencing Administration (Special Report: Administrator/Clinician Clashes)
2006
Crucial Conversations: The Most Potent Force for Eliminating Disruptive Behavior.
2009