Size
How It Explains the World
-
- €8.99
Publisher Description
'There is no author whose books I look forward to more' Bill Gates
The New York Times bestselling author returns with a mind-opening exploration of how size defines life on Earth.
Explaining the key processes shaping size in nature, society and technology, Smil busts myths around proportions - from bodies to paintings and the so-called golden ratio - tells us what Jonathan Swift got wrong in Gulliver's Travels - the giant Brobdingnagian's legs would buckle under their enormous weight - and dives headfirst into the most contentious issue in ergonomics: the size of aeroplane seats.
It is no exaggeration to say this fascinating and wide-ranging tour de force will change the way you look at absolutely everything.
‘Vaclav Smil is a phenomenon with an appetite for facts over prejudice and fashion. Essential reading for anyone who cares about the future’ Lord Norman Foster
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
In this meandering investigation, Smil (Grand Transitions), a geography professor at the University of Manitoba, Canada, meditates on size and its relation to status, intelligence, wealth, and beauty. Offering up loosely connected musings on the role that growth, scale, proportion, and other size-related concepts play in nature and human affairs, Smil contends that human efforts to make ever larger objects, "from TV screens to skyscrapers," are the result of industrialization and its emphasis on developing increasingly efficient means of harvesting energy. He suggests that body size has complex consequences; studies show that taller children have higher test scores and that taller adults make more money than their shorter counterparts. Smil considers limitations on scaling up and observes that while larger wind turbines generate more power, rotor weight increases exponentially with blade length, restricting how big turbines can get. Debunking common myths, Smil notes that while some mathematicians claim the proportions of the golden ratio are "esthetically superior," studies have failed to prove a correlation between how pleasing subjects find a painting or face and how closely it adheres to the ratio. There's plenty of stimulating trivia, but the lack of an overarching framework to give meaning to the disparate facts leaves this feeling inconclusive. This intermittently fascinates, even as it struggles to find the point. Photos.
