'Til Death Or Distance Do Us Part
Love and Marriage in African America
-
- €23.99
-
- €23.99
Publisher Description
Conventional wisdom tells us that marriage was illegal for African Americans during the antebellum era, and that if people married at all, their vows were tenuous ones: "until death or distance do us part." It is an impression that imbues beliefs about black families to this day. But it's a perception primarily based on documents produced by abolitionists, the state, or other partisans. It doesn't tell the whole story.
Drawing on a trove of less well-known sources including family histories, folk stories, memoirs, sermons, and especially the fascinating writings from the Afro-Protestant Press,'Til Death or Distance Do Us Part offers a radically different perspective on antebellum love and family life.
Frances Smith Foster applies the knowledge she's developed over a lifetime of reading and thinking. Advocating both the potency of skepticism and the importance of story-telling, her book shows the way toward a more genuine, more affirmative understanding of African American romance, both then and now.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Faced with "a plethora of stories about promiscuous coupling and fatherless families, instability, and group dysfunction," Foster (Written by Herself) illuminates the African-American historical experience of love and marriage through the stories "that antebellum African Americans told among themselves." She relies particularly on the records of the 18th century Free African Union Societies of Newport, R.I., and Philadelphia and 19th-century slave narratives along with contemporaneous novels and poems. The most groundbreaking content stems from the Afro-Protestant press periodicals, which are "treasure troves of ideas, experiences, and ideals." She has more on her mind than emending the historical record; after leaving the antebellum period, where she amply demonstrates that African-American marriage "was frequent, that family ties were strong," she embarks on digressive journeys. Her meditations on "negative contemporary narratives," the work of various social scientists ("friendly fire in our battle to be a free people in a free country"), her daughter's wedding, and the Defense of Marriage Act somewhat dilute the richness of her primary theme. Still, readers will be freshly informed by the historical and, perhaps, engaged by the tangential.
