Fera v. Village Plaza Fera v. Village Plaza

Fera v. Village Plaza

MI.353 , 242 N.W.2d 372, 639 (1976)(396 Mich)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrizione dell’editore

Plaintiffs Anthony Fera and Frank Fera were awarded damages by a jury in Wayne Circuit Court, Charles A. Wickens, J., against defendants Village Plaza, Inc., Fairborn Property Co., Inc., Schostak Brothers & Company, Inc., and Bank of the Commonwealth, for loss of anticipated profits of their proposed new business as a result of breach of a lease. The Court of Appeals, McGregor, P. J., and J. H. Gillis, J. (O'Hara, J., Dissenting), reversed and remanded for a new trial on the amount of damages, holding that lost profits for a new business were not a proper element of damages and that plaintiffs' proofs of lost profits were speculative (Docket Nos. 14569, 14570). Plaintiffs appeal and defendants cross-appeal. Held: 1. A new business may recover anticipated lost profits for breach of contract. The issue is one of sufficiency of proof. In order to be entitled to a judgment for damages for breach of contract, a plaintiff must lay a basis for a reasonable estimate of the extent of his harm, measured in money. Future profits are not excluded as an element of damages unless they are uncertain; in any case where future profits may be established with reasonable certainty they are allowed.

GENERE
Professionali e tecnici
PUBBLICATO
1976
3 giugno
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
12
EDITORE
LawApp Publishers
DIMENSIONE
57,2
KB

Altri libri di Supreme Court of Michigan

People State Michigan v. Dwayne Pickens People State Michigan v. Dwayne Pickens
1994
Sotomayor v. Ford Motor Company Sotomayor v. Ford Motor Company
1942
Kolakowski v. Cyman Kolakowski v. Cyman
1938
People State Michigan v. Larry Raper People State Michigan v. Larry Raper
1990
Harry G. Bourne v. Farmers Insurance Harry G. Bourne v. Farmers Insurance
1995
Carnell Betty v. Brooks & Perkins Carnell Betty v. Brooks & Perkins
1994