Kofmehl V. Steelman
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrizione dell’editore
SWEENEY, C.J. --The facts of this case are set out in some detail in this court's opinion, Kofmehl v. Steelman, 63 Wash. App. 133, 816 P.2d 1258 (1991). We will not repeat those facts other than to note that we reversed the trial court and held that the filing of a notice of intent to declare a forfeiture was not an irrevocable election of remedies. The case was then remanded.