People v. Murray People v. Murray

People v. Murray

912 P.2d 554, 1996.CO.40937

    • 0,49 €
    • 0,49 €

Descrizione dell’editore

Original Proceeding in Discipline EN BANC A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be publicly censured, that he make certain restitution, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to the panel's recommendation as too lenient, and the respondent has not filed an answer brief. We agree with the assistant disciplinary counsel that the respondent's misconduct warrants a period of suspension. We therefore order that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, be required to make certain restitution prior to reinstatement, and be assessed costs. I.

GENERE
Professionali e tecnici
PUBBLICATO
1996
11 marzo
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
5
EDITORE
LawApp Publishers
DATI DEL FORNITORE
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
DIMENSIONE
52,2
KB
People v. Newman People v. Newman
1996
People v. Rotenberg People v. Rotenberg
1996
Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001
People v. Doherty People v. Doherty
1996
People v. Woodrum People v. Woodrum
1996