U. V. U.: the High Court on Relocation (Australia) U. V. U.: the High Court on Relocation (Australia)

U. V. U.: the High Court on Relocation (Australia‪)‬

Melbourne University Law Review 2003, August, 27, 2

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrizione dell’editore

[In this ease note I comment on the High Court's recent and highly-publicised decision in U v U. In this case, a majority of the Court dismissed a mother's appeal against a decision of the Family Court which prevented her from relocating with her daughter to India, I provide some background context to relocation, identify the legal issues and discuss decisions on those issues in the High Court. I argue that the decision has left the law on relocation less clear than it has ever been. I then analyse the decision by reference to a number of themes: discretion and its alternatives; gender equality; violence; a more inquisitorial Family Court; and legal strategies. I argue that attention must now turn to legislative reform and that such reform should embody legislative principles and presumptions which defer to the judgment of a child's primary caregiver in relocation cases.] I INTRODUCTION

GENERE
Professionali e tecnici
PUBBLICATO
2003
1 agosto
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
37
EDITORE
Melbourne University Law Review
DIMENSIONE
278,7
KB

Altri libri di Melbourne University Law Review

When 'Plain Language' Legislation Is Ambiguous--Sources of Doubt and Lessons for the Plain Language Movement. When 'Plain Language' Legislation Is Ambiguous--Sources of Doubt and Lessons for the Plain Language Movement.
2010
Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (Book Review) Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (Book Review)
2005
A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (Book Review) A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (Book Review)
2005
Effective Regulation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission: The Civil Penalty Problem. Effective Regulation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission: The Civil Penalty Problem.
2009
Radio 2UE Sydney Pty. Ltd. V. Burns (EOD); Commonwealth V. Wood; T. Trust Co. Of Australia Ltd. (T/As Stockland Property Management) V. Skiwing Pty. Ltd. (T/As Cafe Tiffany's); Attorney-General (NSW) V. 2UE Sydney Pty. Ltd.: State Tribunals and Chapter III of the Australian Constitution. Radio 2UE Sydney Pty. Ltd. V. Burns (EOD); Commonwealth V. Wood; T. Trust Co. Of Australia Ltd. (T/As Stockland Property Management) V. Skiwing Pty. Ltd. (T/As Cafe Tiffany's); Attorney-General (NSW) V. 2UE Sydney Pty. Ltd.: State Tribunals and Chapter III of the Australian Constitution.
2007
Unjust Enrichment (Book Review) Unjust Enrichment (Book Review)
2004