Unintended Consequences of the Feminist Sex/Gender Distinction (Essay) Unintended Consequences of the Feminist Sex/Gender Distinction (Essay)

Unintended Consequences of the Feminist Sex/Gender Distinction (Essay‪)‬

Genders 2006, June, 43

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrizione dell’editore

[1] The average person does not distinguish between "sex" and "gender," and uses the two terms interchangeably. The same can be said of a significant number of social scientists. For instance, an unsystematic review of one recent issue of Sociological Forum and several recent issues of American Journal of Sociology produced five examples of this conflation of sex and gender (Bonilla-Silva et al., 562; Huffman and Cohen, 912; Lincoln and Allen, 621; Petersen and Saporta, 855; Rutherford, 593). This treatment of "sex" and "gender" as synonymous dismisses, whether knowingly or unknowingly, the considerable conceptual work of gender scholars over the last thirty years and harks back to essentialist as well as determinist notions of sex, conflating, among other things, social roles, psychological dispositions, power differences, norms of grooming and comportment, sexual object choice and reproductive anatomy. Such an understanding thus collapses important intellectual and experiential distinctions; in so doing, it also fails to provide conceptual categories for the experiences of women and men whose sex, gender, and/or sexuality do not "align" in socially normative ways. The instantiation of the conceptual separation of gender from sex was an effort to give language to some of these distinctions, and the subsequent rigorous critical assessment of the term "gender" over the intervening decades has further refined them. [2] Although it is impossible to make accurate generalizations about the work of all gender scholars, the prevailing trends can be usefully defined and studied. Here I am addressing the vast body of gender scholarship that continues to rely, either implicitly or explicitly, on the conceptual distinction between sex and gender. While my analysis draws predominantly--though not exclusively--on social scientific scholarship, the trends I will outline apply equally to humanistic scholarship that is organized conceptually by the sex/gender distinction.

GENERE
Consultazione
PUBBLICATO
2006
1 giugno
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
42
EDITORE
Genders
DIMENSIONE
371,8
KB

Altri libri di Genders

Male Stewardesses: Male Flight Attendants As a Queer Miscarriage of Justice (Essay) Male Stewardesses: Male Flight Attendants As a Queer Miscarriage of Justice (Essay)
2007
Woolf's Orlando and the Resonances of Trans Studies (Virginia Woolf) (Critical Essay) Woolf's Orlando and the Resonances of Trans Studies (Virginia Woolf) (Critical Essay)
2010
Gender As the Next Top Model of Global Consumer-Citizenship (Critical Essay) Gender As the Next Top Model of Global Consumer-Citizenship (Critical Essay)
2010
From Croft to Campus: Extra-Marital Pregnancy and the Scottish Literary Renaissance (Critical Essay) From Croft to Campus: Extra-Marital Pregnancy and the Scottish Literary Renaissance (Critical Essay)
2008
Jocasta and the Rebirth of Matriarchy: Embodied Spectatorship in Margaret Oliphant's "the Portrait" (Critical Essay) Jocasta and the Rebirth of Matriarchy: Embodied Spectatorship in Margaret Oliphant's "the Portrait" (Critical Essay)
2010
You Have Not What You Ought: Gender and Corporeal Intelligibility in Henry Fielding's the Female Husband (Critical Essay) You Have Not What You Ought: Gender and Corporeal Intelligibility in Henry Fielding's the Female Husband (Critical Essay)
2010