What Laws were "Not Good"? A Canonical Approach to the Theological Problem of Ezekiel 20:25-26. What Laws were "Not Good"? A Canonical Approach to the Theological Problem of Ezekiel 20:25-26.

What Laws were "Not Good"? A Canonical Approach to the Theological Problem of Ezekiel 20:25-26‪.‬

Journal of Biblical Literature 2004, Summer, 123, 2

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrizione dell’editore

Ezekiel 20:25-26 is one of the most infamous interpretive cruxes of the book of Ezekiel. As Hartmut Gese put it, "Die Auslegung von Ez 20,25f., ... ist schon seit den Anfangen alttestamentlicher Wissenschaft als besonders schwieriges Problem empfunden worden." (1) In these two verses, the writer of the book, whom we will call "Ezekiel" without prejudice toward debates about authorship, makes the shocking claim that the LORD gave Israel "laws that were not good," which not only failed to give the people life but actually defiled them: [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

GENERE
Professionali e tecnici
PUBBLICATO
2004
22 giugno
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
38
EDITORE
Society of Biblical Literature
DIMENSIONE
232,2
KB

Altri libri di Journal of Biblical Literature

Novum Testamentum Graece. Novum Testamentum Graece.
2006
A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature.
2001
Derhetorizing Paul: A Dynamic Perspective on Pauline Theology and the Law. Derhetorizing Paul: A Dynamic Perspective on Pauline Theology and the Law.
2004
Deutero-Isaiah: A Commentary on Isaiah 40-55. Deutero-Isaiah: A Commentary on Isaiah 40-55.
2004
The Usefulness of an Onesimus: The Sexual Use of Slaves and Paul's Letter to Philemon. The Usefulness of an Onesimus: The Sexual Use of Slaves and Paul's Letter to Philemon.
2011
Brotherly Love and the High Priest Christology of Hebrews. Brotherly Love and the High Priest Christology of Hebrews.
2003