Impact of overoptimism and overconfidence on economic behavior: Literature review, measurement methods and empirical evidence Impact of overoptimism and overconfidence on economic behavior: Literature review, measurement methods and empirical evidence

Impact of overoptimism and overconfidence on economic behavior: Literature review, measurement methods and empirical evidence

    • ¥4,000
    • ¥4,000

Publisher Description

This paper aims to give an overview of two related human traits that have attracted particularly wide interest, namely overconfidence and overoptimism. The two are closely related to each other, and often used synonymously. Broadly speaking, overconfidence results in underestimation of future risks, e.g. the riskiness of future cash flows, whilst overoptimism leads to an overestimation of future positive outcomes, e.g. the future returns of a company. Besides, the paper wants to deduct suggestions for further research, by systematically identifying uncovered topics in existing literature.
This paper also provides a closer look at the empirical methods normally applied in
field studies. Although the phenomena are intuitively understandable, empirical researchstill presents itself as a mosaic of fragmented testing rather than a coherent
framework. One may assume that this is mainly caused by the difficult measurability of overconfidence and overoptimism: On the one hand, the decision maker, convinced of his own rationality, contributes zero overconfidence or overoptimism to his actions.

On the other hand, even a neutral observer cannot specify any degree of biasedness a priori, as stochastic outcomes per definition do not allow for perfect prediction. Therefore, scientists frequently rely on proxy variables that at least allow for measuring a group’s average overoptimism or overconfidence.
Furthermore, this paper empirically examines several considerations regarding existing
research and measurement methods. It particularly aims to connect biasedness with certain personal and economic characteristics, namely participants’ gender, industry affiliation, company life cycle, success and risk preferences. Additionally, different methods are employed for measuring overoptimism. By comparing the strength of bias indicated by each scaling, one gets interesting insights into the influence that question design has on test results.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2007
October 19
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
83
Pages
PUBLISHER
GRIN Verlag
SELLER
Open Publishing GmbH
SIZE
1.5
MB
Managerial Overconfidence and Education – Insights from Dual Process Theory Managerial Overconfidence and Education – Insights from Dual Process Theory
2013
Overconfidence - A Matter of Education? Overconfidence - A Matter of Education?
2012
The Terms of Negotiation The Terms of Negotiation
2014
Social Desirability and Environmental Valuation Social Desirability and Environmental Valuation
2012
Performance Measurement and Theory Performance Measurement and Theory
2017
Organizational Behavior 5 Organizational Behavior 5
2008
Machine learning, Python i data science. Wprowadzenie Machine learning, Python i data science. Wprowadzenie
2023
Bilanzpolitische Möglichkeiten bei der Abbildung von Vorräten im IFRS-Jahresabschluss nach IAS 2 Bilanzpolitische Möglichkeiten bei der Abbildung von Vorräten im IFRS-Jahresabschluss nach IAS 2
2012
Cash is King - Bedeutung des Finanzcontrollings für eine erfolgreiche Unternehmenssteuerung Cash is King - Bedeutung des Finanzcontrollings für eine erfolgreiche Unternehmenssteuerung
2010
SEPA-Überweisung und SEPA-Lastschriftverfahren - Möglichkeiten und juristische Ausgestaltung SEPA-Überweisung und SEPA-Lastschriftverfahren - Möglichkeiten und juristische Ausgestaltung
2011
Financial Crisis - Impacts and Reactions Financial Crisis - Impacts and Reactions
2011
Beweisrechtliche Folgen beim Verstoß des Unfallversicherungsträgers gegen seine Hinweispflicht auf das Widerspruchsrecht gemäß §200 Abs. 2 SGB VII, § 76 Abs. 2 SGB X Beweisrechtliche Folgen beim Verstoß des Unfallversicherungsträgers gegen seine Hinweispflicht auf das Widerspruchsrecht gemäß §200 Abs. 2 SGB VII, § 76 Abs. 2 SGB X
2011