Lara
het aangrijpende liefdesverhaal achter dokter Zjivago
-
- ¥2,200
-
- ¥2,200
発行者による作品情報
Stalin spaarde het leven van Boris Pasternak, maar diens minnares en literaire muze Olga Ivinskaja werd tweemaal naar een Siberisch werkkamp gestuurd; de eerste keer kreeg ze een miskraam van hun kind. Olga heeft lang gedacht en tevergeefs gehoopt dat Boris zijn vrouw voor haar zou verlaten. Anna Pasternak verkent op basis van onbekend bronnenmateriaal en met medewerking van Olga's dochter het morele handelen van haar oudoom. Alles komt in dit dramatische verhaal bij elkaar: onvoorstelbare moed, loyaliteit en het menselijk tekort. Deze opmerkelijke liefdesrelatie werpt een fascinerend nieuw licht op Boris Pasternak en zijn meesterwerk Dokter Zjivago.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
This accessible history sketches the stories of a literary love affair and a great novel whose cultural and political impact may now seem almost unimaginable to a modern audience. Boris Pasternak's Doctor Zhivago, an epic of revolutionary Russia and the passion that burned between its eponymous protagonist and his beloved Lara Guichard, had a history nearly as tumultuous as its story line. As described by Anna Pasternak (Daisy Dooley Does Divorce), an English journalist and great-niece of the late author, twice-married Boris's 13-year liaison with editor Olga Ivinskaya was passionate and consuming, and likely the reason he could complete his great work Ivinskaya provided him both inspiration and practical assistance. Much of this history recounts Boris's hounding by Soviet authorities, who objected to his unflattering portrayal of the revolution, blocked his book's publication in Russia, and forced him to decline the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1958. For Ivinskaya's part, she was harassed by the KGB, suffered two miscarriages, and twice was sentenced to labor camps, first to pressure Boris to abandon Zhivago and then to punish her for his defiance. Boris emerges here as self-absorbed, vain, reckless, and also brave enough to get his opus published. Pasternak doesn't always convey the larger historical context, but nonetheless this is a sensitive and fairly careful account of one of literature's great backstories.
