Logic, Probability, and Presumptions in Legal Reasoning Logic, Probability, and Presumptions in Legal Reasoning
    • ¥34,800

Publisher Description

At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the "sophistical" arguments offered by the Sophists -- who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and the justifications they offer for their decisions are a vital means by which citizens can assess the legitimacy of how that power is exercised. However, to evaluate judicial justifications requires close attention to the method of reasoning behind decisions. This new collection illuminates and explains the political and moral importance in justifying the exercise of judicial power.

GENRE
Nonfiction
RELEASED
2013
June 17
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
416
Pages
PUBLISHER
Taylor & Francis
SELLER
Taylor & Francis Group
SIZE
5.3
MB
Belief, Action, and Rationality over Time Belief, Action, and Rationality over Time
2018
From Rules to Meanings From Rules to Meanings
2018
Contrastivism in Philosophy Contrastivism in Philosophy
2013
Epistemic Dilemmas Epistemic Dilemmas
2021
Paradox Paradox
2014
Philosophic Thoughts Philosophic Thoughts
2014
Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning
2013
Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
2013
Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning
2013
Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
2013