Natural
The Seductive Myth of Nature’s Goodness
-
- ¥950
-
- ¥950
発行者による作品情報
A TIMES AND SUNDAY TIMES SCIENCE BOOK OF THE YEAR
Without our realising it, a single, slippery concept has become a secular deity throughout the modern industrial world. We make terrible sacrifices in its name: of our money, our health, and our planet. That deity is nature itself.
From supermarket shoppers to evolutionary biologists, from atheists to pastors, from Alex Jones to Gwyneth Paltrow, we are all prone to the intuitive faith that life should be lived 'naturally'.
But nature can't teach us how to live. If we try to stick to its imagined commands, eschewing human artifice in pursuit of Edenic purity, we jeopardise the environment, our health, and our society. (We also waste a lot of money on pots of weird slime). It is time to accept our profound responsibility to shape the world of which our technology and our selves are wholly a part.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Levinovitz, professor of religion at James Madison University, makes a nuanced plea for a more informed relationship with the natural world in this evocative, convincing work. Arguing that "natural goodness" often serves as "a mercenary ethic that anyone can hire to fight for their cause," he asks readers to stop idolizing what's "natural," so as to take better care of nature and society's neediest. Levinovitz believes a balance needs to be struck between awe of the natural world and its preservation, and is critical of appeals that defend socioeconomic disparity (such as the virtue of "natural" products with exorbitant price tags), eschew modern medicine (as with vaccine refusal), or reduce wildness to human terms (hunters "giving animals a sporting chance' "). Rich with interviews, anecdotes, and citations, Levinovitz's work makes a strong case for the wisdom of compromise and humility. While Levinovitz is more articulate about what he's against than what he's for, he argues that "passionate activism is completely compatible with acknowledging complexity and ambiguity." It may seem paradoxical indeed, but this argument for removing "natural" from the altar of absolute good will certainly start conversations, particularly among naturalists and environmentalists.
