![Baylor University Medical Center v. Rosa](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Baylor University Medical Center v. Rosa](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Baylor University Medical Center v. Rosa
240 S.W.3D 565, 2007.TX.0009770
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
In this interlocutory appeal, Baylor University Medical Center (BUMC) and Sara Thomas, R.N. appeal the trial judges order denying their objections to Dianna Rosas expert reports and denying their motion to dismiss. BUMC and Nurse Thomas raise two issues: (i) error by the trial judge in finding a sufficient expert report and denying their motion to dismiss, and (ii) whether a deposition satisfies statutory expert report requirements. We affirm the trial courts order.