Cabbler v. Commonwealth

The defendant claims that the trial court erred in three respects. These are: (1) the admission in evidence of stolen goods found in Cabblers car; (2) the granting of any instructions on receiving stolen property when the Commonwealth elected to rely on the general larceny statutes for conviction; and (3) the granting of other instructions tendered by the Commonwealth setting forth the presumptions which arise from the possession of recently stolen property.