Cadle v. Helfrich Cadle v. Helfrich

Cadle v. Helfrich

286 P. 186, 36 ARIZ. 390, 1930.AZ.40075

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The defendant filed a general demurrer to the complaint; also answered admitting plaintiff had its policy insuring baled cotton in the yard 100 feet from gin; also the destruction by fire of cotton sued for, and put in issue by denial all the other averments of the complaint, except that it admitted the fire was reported to it and that it investigated it. The answer also set out in defense of the action certain provisions of the policy, to wit: One describing the cotton insured as being baled cotton in the cotton yard 100 feet from gin; another, the "clear space clause," which provided that there should be kept clear 100 feet intervening between the gin and the cotton yard; and another which provided that the conditions, provisions and agreements written upon or attached to the policy could not be waived unless the waiver was written upon or attached thereto. The answer contained a denial that any demand for payment of loss was ever made before bringing suit.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1930
24 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
52.6
KB

More Books by Arizona Supreme Court

Swanson v. Image Bank Swanson v. Image Bank
2003
Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole
1995
Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp. Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.
1995
Sohl v. Winkler Sohl v. Winkler
1994
Matter of Evans Matter of Evans
1995
Wagenseller V. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital Wagenseller V. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital
1985