Card v. State Card v. State

Card v. State

927 SO.2D 200, 31 FLA. L. WEEKLY D1180, 2006.FL.0003324

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

James Card appeals his conviction for driving while his license was revoked as an habitual offender, in violation of section 322.34(5), Florida Statutes (2004). Card argues that driving records are testimonial hearsay; consequently, the rights guaranteed to him by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment were violated when his driving record was introduced at trial without a showing that the records custodian of the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles ("DHSMV") was unavailable and that he had a prior opportunity to cross-examine that person. We hold that a self-authenticating driving record is not testimonial hearsay and affirm Cards conviction.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
28 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
57.9
KB

More Books by Second Division. Illinois Appellate Court – Second District

Jackson v. State Jackson v. State
2009
State v. Williams State v. Williams
2001