Cardoso v. Fpb Bank Cardoso v. Fpb Bank

Cardoso v. Fpb Bank

879 SO.2D 1247, 2004.FL.0001742 , 29 FLA. L. WEEKLY 980

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Brandon Bradley appeals his conviction for capital sexual battery. He argues that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear his extra-judicial confession, because the state had no other evidence of sexual union and thus no independent proof that the crime of capital sexual battery was committed. We conclude that the confession was properly admitted under section 92.565, Florida Statutes, which creates an exception to the general rule requiring the state to prove the corpus delicti of a crime as a predicate to the introduction of a confession. Therefore, we affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
21 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.7
KB

More Books by A.D. 2004 In the District Court of Appeal of Florida Third District January Term

American International Group, Inc. v. Siemens Building Technologies American International Group, Inc. v. Siemens Building Technologies
2004
Lee v. State Lee v. State
2004
D.F. v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services D.F. v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services
2004
State v. Giralt State v. Giralt
2004
Picasso Tower, Inc. v. Dairene International Picasso Tower, Inc. v. Dairene International
2004
Jones v. State Jones v. State
2004