Earl Lance Richmond v. State Indiana

Appellant was convicted by jury of committing a felony while armed, conspiracy to commit a felony and automobile banditry. He was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment for armed robbery and fined $500.00 for conspiracy. The conviction for automobile banditry was merged with armed robbery; therefore no sentence was entered on that charge. Appellant first alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment on the evidence. He claims there was insufficient evidence identifying him as a participant in the crime. This Court does not weigh the evidence or the credibility of witnesses. We look to the evidence most favorable to the State and will affirm the conviction if there is substantial evidence of probative value on each element of the crime charged. Lottie v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 124, 311 N.E.2d 800. The uncorroborated testimony of the victim is sufficient to sustain the conviction. Douglas v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 517, 261 N.E.2d 567.