Gillespie v. Seymour Gillespie v. Seymour

Gillespie v. Seymour

250 Kan. 123, 823 P.2d 782, KS.0042298(1991)

    • 0,49 €
    • 0,49 €

Publisher Description

The opinion of the court was delivered by This is an action by beneficiaries of a trust for recovery of damages for oil and gas investments made by the Trust. The case before us was determined in a bench trial and involves a very complex factual situation as witnessed by the trial court's entry of over 200 findings of fact. A highly summarized statement of the facts is as follows. Warren Brown was a wealthy Wichita businessman. In 1956, Mr. Brown created two revocable inter vivos trusts. His two children, Dorothy Brown Wofford and Pauline Brown Gillespie, were the co-trustees of each trust. In the trust instruments, the trustees were vested with full legal and equitable title to the trust property; the effect of such language will be discussed in the standing issue of this opinion. Broad powers were granted to the trustees as to the investment of trust property, to-wit:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1991
17 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
39
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
72
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Kansas

Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs
1996
In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks
1996
Bair v. Peck Bair v. Peck
1991
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986
Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry
1975