Helfman v. Ge Group Life Assurance Co. Helfman v. Ge Group Life Assurance Co.

Helfman v. Ge Group Life Assurance Co‪.‬

573 F.3D 383, 47 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CAS. 1533, 2009.C06.0000783

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

After suffering various cardiac episodes in late 2003, Helfman began receiving disability benefits from defendant-appellees Genworth Life and Health Insurance Company, formerly known as GE Group Life Assurance Company ("Genworth"), and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ("Sun Life"). Genworth and Sun Life terminated payment of LTD benefits to Helfman in March 2005 and May 2005, respectively. The district court below found that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") governed plaintiffs plan, as plaintiff had not satisfied the first of four required criteria for the so-called "safe harbor" exemption from ERISA to apply. Applying applicable ERISA standards, the district court upheld defendants termination of plaintiffs disability benefits as not arbitrary or capricious. Helfman appeals the finding that his LTD benefits plans are governed by ERISA and the finding that Sun Lifes termination of benefits was not arbitrary or capricious.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
24 July
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
26
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
76.5
KB

More Books by Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
1993
Davis v. Great Western Bank Davis v. Great Western Bank
1993
Wiley v. Thomas Wiley v. Thomas
1993
Arlook v. Lichtenberg Arlook v. Lichtenberg
1992
Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts
1992
In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.
1989