Immigration Policy and "Immanent Critique" (Critical Essay‪)‬

Professor Joseph Carens, in his thought-provoking and eloquently written essay "The Rights of Irregular Migrants," defends the view that irregular migrants have a moral claim to a broad range of rights in a liberal democratic state that goes beyond their claim to basic procedural and liberty rights. I want to reflect here on the method that Carens uses to extract the reasons that may support, or ground, this assertion--namely, that of immanent, or internal, critique. This is an approach to normative ethical reasoning that grounds moral prescriptions on the not yet realized normative purpose of the institution or practice for which change is sought--in this case the immigration policies of liberal democratic states. In immanent critique one uses what one perceives to be the unfulfilled normative criteria that an institution formulates and judges itself by as the basis for prescribing how that institution should be organized in order to qualify as just. The point is to pull out the unfulfilled potential for change inherent in already existing social arrangements, with the aim of "enabling and encouraging future social transformation." (1)