Louise M. Oberkirch v. City St. Petersburg Louise M. Oberkirch v. City St. Petersburg

Louise M. Oberkirch v. City St. Petersburg

FL.40313; 95 So. 2d 519 (1957)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Per Curiam. This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument; It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is Affirmed.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1957
29 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59
KB

More Books by Special Division A. Supreme Court of Florida

Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District v. Certain Lands Upon Which Taxes Due Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District v. Certain Lands Upon Which Taxes Due
1948
John W. Bullock v. Earl R. Harwick John W. Bullock v. Earl R. Harwick
1947
Henry M. Wallace v. Claude J. Luxmoore Henry M. Wallace v. Claude J. Luxmoore
1946
Peoples Water and Gas Company v. Cecil M. Webb Et Al. Peoples Water and Gas Company v. Cecil M. Webb Et Al.
1957
D. D. Colburn and Wife v. City Lakeland D. D. Colburn and Wife v. City Lakeland
1956
Charles R. Marshall v. Elizabeth L. Marshall Charles R. Marshall v. Elizabeth L. Marshall
1944