![Marks v. Laberge](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Marks v. Laberge](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Marks v. Laberge
703 P.2d 559, 146 Ariz. 12, 1985.AZ.40312
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Hilaire LaBerge appeals from a judgment of default entered against him in a breach of contract action. He contends that service was not valid under rule 4(d)(1), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, or, alternatively, that the trial court should have dismissed the action or granted a new trial. We find that service was valid and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. We affirm.