Markville State Bank v. Henry L Markville State Bank v. Henry L

Markville State Bank v. Henry L

MN.21 , 228 N.W. 757, 246 (1930)(179 Minn)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

When note given to closed bank by one of its directors is not accommodation paper. 1. Where a director and stockholder of a closed bank, who is also liable as guarantor on obligations of the bank, gives to the bank his personal note and places the same in the bank as a valid asset in order to enable the bank to reopen, and on the faith of such note and other like securities the bank is permitted to and does reopen and continues in business, with such note as one of its listed valid assets, the note is supported by a valuable consideration and is not an accommodation note.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1930
17 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982