Moore v. State Moore v. State

Moore v. State

880 So.2d 826, 2004.FL.0003289, L. Weekly D1896(29 Fla)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Michael Moore appeals the order designating him a sexual predator in accordance with the Florida Sexual Predators Act, section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2003). He contends that the Act is unconstitutional in several ways, and argues that the trial court lost jurisdiction to enter the order once sixty days had elapsed after sentencing. We uphold the order. We find no violation of state or federal procedural due process, on the authority of Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003). Contra Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC03-2103 (Fla. Nov. 10, 2003). Likewise on the authority of Therrien, we reject appellant's contention that the Act violates the separation of powers clause in article II, section 3, of the Florida Constitution. See Therrien, 859 So. 2d at 586-87.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
18 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
54.5
KB

More Books by State of Florida In the District Court of Appeal First District

Staten v. Gonzalez-Falla Staten v. Gonzalez-Falla
2005
J.I.S. v. State J.I.S. v. State
2005
Kennard v. State Kennard v. State
2005
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Oser Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Oser
2005
Dudley v. Dudley Dudley v. Dudley
2005
State v. Nichols State v. Nichols
2005