National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Co‪.‬

The Board found that respondents had committed unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(1)(2) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. Upon an examination of the record we conclude that the findings are supported by substantial evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 61 S. Ct. 358, 85 L. Ed. 368. In view of our limited power of review [see N.L.R. (B) v. Milan Shirt Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 376, decided Feb. 4, 1942] we do not think that a detailed discussion of the findings will be particularly helpful. In this respect we are content to follow the practice in Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 312 U.S. 660, 61 S. Ct. 736, 85 L. Ed. 1108, and National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co., 62 S. Ct. 608, 86 L. Ed. , decided by the Supreme Court February 16, 1942.