Patton v. Diemer Patton v. Diemer

Patton v. Diemer

35 Ohio St.3d 68, 518 N.E.2d 941, OH.40021(1988)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

SWEENEY, J. The instant appeal involves the interpretation of R.C. 2323.13 and its relationship to a confession of judgment obtained
as a result of an action for attorney fees. R.C. 2323.13(A) authorizes the use of a warrant of attorney to confess judgment.
It provides:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1988
3 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
53.3
KB

More Books by The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati
1987
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli
1987
Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth. Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth.
1953
In re Pottery In re Pottery
1954
State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
2004
State v. Doe State v. Doe
2004