Sam H. Lipson v. H.M.R. Enterprises Sam H. Lipson v. H.M.R. Enterprises

Sam H. Lipson v. H.M.R. Enterprises

NY.47373; 193 N.Y.S.2d 138; 9 A.D.2d 759 (1959)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Judgment unanimously modified on the facts and on the law, and, as modified, otherwise affirmed, without costs. In this action
to set aside chattel mortgages and for other relief, the trial court properly found that the mortgages were invalid as fraudulent
transfers in violation of the rights of creditors. It is clear, however, that the conspiracy to perpetrate the fraud did not
occur prior to May 14, 1957. Between March 4 and March 21, 1957, H.M.R. acquired certain conditional sales contracts by assignment
and as part of a loan made to the judgment debtor. From the record, we find that these transfers were bona fide, made in good
faith, and for valuable consideration. It follows, therefore, that these liens were validly acquired and held by H.M.R. at
the time the fraudulent transfers were made. On reopening the case, the trial court took proof which established that the
amount due on the contracts in question was $4,351.20. However, the application of H.M.R. for an offset and for a credit of
that sum was denied. Since the judgment properly required H.M.R. to account for the proceeds realized on the sale of the chattels
which were the subject of these conditional sales contracts, it is entitled to a credit or offset for the amount remaining
due on them (Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Halsted, 134 N. Y. 520). The subsequent conduct of H.M.R., while to be condemned, does
not deprive it of its rights under these valid contracts. Under the circumstances, H.M.R. should be credited with the sum
of $4,351.20 against the amount awarded to the plaintiff in the judgment. The judgment is accordingly modified in the fourth
decretal paragraph to substitute the sum of $3,630.78 in place of the sum of $7,981.38 appearing therein. The ninth decretal
paragraph is modified to read as follows: "that the defendant H.M.R. Enterprises, Inc. is entitled to an offset credit in
the sum of $4,351.20 by virtue of a prior valid assignment to it and its ownership of five pre-existing conditional sale agreements,
and on like motion, it is." Settle order. Concur - Breitel, J.P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ. [ 16 Misc.
2d 447. ]

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1959
27 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
61.5
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of New York

Hwesu S. Murray Hwesu S. Murray
1991
Bsl Development Corp. Bsl Development Corp.
1991
Matter West Branch Conservation Association v. Planning Board Matter West Branch Conservation Association v. Planning Board
1991
Alberta Horton Et Al. v. City Schenectady Alberta Horton Et Al. v. City Schenectady
1991
Joyce Schumacher Et Al. v. Lutheran Community Services Joyce Schumacher Et Al. v. Lutheran Community Services
1991
People State New York v. Darryl Morgan People State New York v. Darryl Morgan
1991