Samuel Ben Zev v. Louis Merman Et Al. Samuel Ben Zev v. Louis Merman Et Al.

Samuel Ben Zev v. Louis Merman Et Al‪.‬

NY.52802; 533 N.E.2d 669; 73 N.Y.2d 781 (1988)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

What constitutes a reasonable time for performance depends upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case (see, Ballen
v Potter, 251 NY 224; Murray Co. v Lidgerwood Mfg. Co., 241 NY 455, 459). Included within a court's determination of reasonableness
are the nature and object of the contract, the previous conduct of the parties, the presence or absence of good faith, the
experience of the parties and the possibility of prejudice or hardship to either one, as well as the specific number of days
provided for performance (see, Murray Co. v Lidgerwood Mfg. Co., supra, at 459; Ballen v Potter, supra; 76 N.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1988
29 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.3
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of New York

Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991
Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern
1991
People State New York v. Timothy B. Cooper People State New York v. Timothy B. Cooper
1991
Gerard A. Dolan v. Lois A. Dolan Gerard A. Dolan v. Lois A. Dolan
1991
Matter Allstate Insurance Company v. Eric Killakey Matter Allstate Insurance Company v. Eric Killakey
1991
Matter Istim v. Chemical Bank Matter Istim v. Chemical Bank
1991