[T][U] Logan v. City of San Diego [T][U] Logan v. City of San Diego

[T][U] Logan v. City of San Diego

92 F.3d 1192, 1996.C09.41801

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MEMORANDUM* Eric Vongrastic Logan, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's ruling on the appropriate statute of limitations, Taylor v. University of California, 993 F.2d 710, 711 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), cert. denied, 127 L. Ed. 2d 83, 114 S. Ct. 890 (1994), and we affirm. Federal courts apply the statute of limitations of the state in which the claim arises for section 1983 actions. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 269, 85 L. Ed. 2d 254, 105 S. Ct. 1938 (1985). State law also determines the application of tolling doctrines. Id. In California, the applicable statute provides for a limitations period of one year from the date the cause of action accrues. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340(3); Taylor, 993 F.2d at 711.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
5 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
55
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996