[T][U] Ostrowski v. Creative Artists Agency Inc. [T][U] Ostrowski v. Creative Artists Agency Inc.

[T][U] Ostrowski v. Creative Artists Agency Inc‪.‬

34 F.3d 1073, 1994.C09.41429

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MEMORANDUM* Michael Ostrowski appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Carolco Pictures Inc., and
other defendants (collectively "Carolco") in his action under the Federal Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§
501, 504. Ostrowski contends that Carolco infringed on the copyright of his screenplay "The Diogenes Syndrome" ("Diogenes"),
through its involvement and distribution of the film "To Forget Palermo" ("Palermo"). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We affirm. We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Kouf v. Walt Disney Pictures & Tel., 16 F.3d 1042, 1044 (9th
Cir. 1994). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any
genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Id.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
29 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
62.7
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996