[T][U] Patterson v. Christopher [T][U] Patterson v. Christopher

[T][U] Patterson v. Christopher

97 F.3d 1460, 1996.C09.41038

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MEMORANDUM* Ray Patterson appeals pro se the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. Patterson's action alleged that the State Department discriminated against him on the basis of his handicap, blindness, by failing to provide reasonable accommodations for him to take the written Foreign Service Officer examination, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 and the Foreign Service Act of 1980, 22 U.S.C. § 3901. Because the district court has subsequently granted Patterson's motion to appoint counsel, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Reimers v. Oregon, 863 F.2d 630, 632 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating that federal courts lack jurisdiction to decide moot issues).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
27 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
54.3
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996