[T][U] Simmons v. Modesto City School District [T][U] Simmons v. Modesto City School District

[T][U] Simmons v. Modesto City School District

100 F.3d 964, 1996.C09.40539

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MEMORANDUM* Beverly and Stanford Simmons appeal the summary judgment in favor of defendants in this employment discrimination action. The Simmonses argue that a conflict between defendant Mello's deposition testimony and his affidavit in support of the summary judgment motion generates a genuine issue of material fact that should preclude summary judgment. We review summary judgments de novo. Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co., 26 F.3d 885, 888 (9th Cir. 1994). We do not make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence; we only determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact remaining for trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202, 106 S. Ct. 2505 (1986).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
12 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
61.5
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996