[T][U] United States v. Conner [T][U] United States v. Conner

[T][U] United States v. Conner

92 F.3d 1194, 1996.C09.41802

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MEMORANDUM* E.J. Conner appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his jury conviction and his sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, and aiding and abetting possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Conner contends that: (1) his conviction and sentence violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; and (2) the district court erred by sentencing him to 121 months imprisonment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2255.1 We review de novo the district court's denial of Conner's § 2255 motion, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir. 1994), and affirm.2 Conner contends that because his conviction and sentence followed the confiscation and forfeiture of currency used in the drug transaction, his conviction and sentence violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
5 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
53.5
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996