[T][U] Walker V. City Of Lompoc [T][U] Walker V. City Of Lompoc

[T][U] Walker V. City Of Lompoc

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

These appeals consist of two separately filed cases, No. 93-55882 (equitable action) and No. 94-55442 (merits action). The equitable action was filed by Walker with the assistance of counsel, seeking a declaration that Walker could lawfully assign his § 1988 attorneys fee rights to his lawyer and asking for a declaration and injunction against the defendants making any settlement offers contingent upon waiver of the § 1988 fees. The merits action was filed the same day by Walker in pro per pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging false arrest and imprisonment. The equitable action was dismissed for lack of justiciability and on case management grounds. The plaintiffs in pro per merits case was later dismissed for failure to prosecute. We affirm both dismissals.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
7 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
61.3
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996