[T][U] Wynn v. Angelone

MEMORANDUM* Charles H. Wynn, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the defendants
in Wynn's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical
needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. "A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo to determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving
party, whether there exist any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant
substantive law." Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709, 712 (9th Cir. 1990). To defeat a summary judgment
motion, the nonmoving party must come forward with evidence sufficient to establish the existence of any elements that are
essential to that party's case, and for which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,
477 U.S. 317, 322, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265, 106 S. Ct. 2548 (1986).