Talley V. Talley

Husband appeals from a final judgment dividing community and separate property and awarding child support, alimony, and attorney fees. He claims error in: (1) the amount of child support; (2) the amount and length of alimony; (3) the division of the community property; (4) the characterization of property; and (5) the award of attorney fees. Except for Issue 3, this case appeared to be a case in which the court's findings were supported by substantial evidence, its Conclusions were supported by the findings, and its discretionary acts were within its authority; in both calendar notices, we have proposed to reverse on Issue 3 and affirm on all others. Neither party has responded to our proposed Disposition of Issue 3, and neither party now opposes the proposed Disposition of Issue 4. For the reasons stated in the calendar notices, we thus  reverse and remand for reconsideration on Issue 3 and affirm on Issue 4, and we do not discuss these issues further. See State v. Johnson, 107 N.M. 356, 758 P.2d 306 (Ct.App.1988). Wife has filed a memorandum in support of our proposed Dispositions of Issues 1, 2, and 5, and Husband has filed memoranda in opposition. We discuss these issues in the opinion that follows, and for the reasons stated, we affirm.