![Tamble v. Downey](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Tamble v. Downey](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Tamble v. Downey
1951.CA.40614 104 CAL. APP. 2D 810; 232 P.2D 543
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Plaintiffs recovered judgment upon the verdict of a jury in an action for the value of building materials furnished to defendant William A. Davidson, a building contractor. The verdict and judgment against defendants and appellants Paul S. Burkholder and Ivan K. Ross were based upon the theory that said appellants were partners with Davidson in the business of building homes. A reversal is sought upon the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to support the verdict, by which the jury impliedly found that appellants were partners with Davidson and therefore liable for the debts incurred by the partnership in the operation of its building business, and that the trial court erred in one of its instructions to the jury.